Pleasant Hill School District 69
Pleasant Hill School District 69 is located close to the center of Illinois. Pleasant Hill School District 69 has 2.00 square miles of land area and has no water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Pleasant Hill School District 69 population is 1,831. Pleasant Hill School District 69 median household income is $37,215 in 2010-2014. Pleasant Hill School District 69 median house value is $74,200 in 2010-2014. On average, Pleasant Hill School District 69 is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Pleasant Hill School District 69 Map and Nearby Locations
3717 West Malone St
Peoria IL, 61605, Peoria County
Phone: 309-637-6829
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 251 | 249 | 246 | 242 | 231 | 222 | 228 |
English Language Learner Students: | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 14.00 | NA | 12.96 | 13.66 | 16.46 | 14.60 | 11.90 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.07 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Elementary: | 13.00 | NA | 11.89 | 12.98 | 14.46 | 12.60 | 7.90 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 3.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 4.00 | 9.10 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.10 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 3.24 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 2.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Support Services: | 3.00 | 3.86 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2.10 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 17.93 | NA | 18.98 | 17.72 | 14.03 | 15.21 | 19.16 |
Schools
Pleasant Hill Elementary School | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 3717 West Malone St, Peoria IL 61605 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 54.5% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.3% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72.8% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 59.1% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 65.4% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 45.8% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.2% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 45.4% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 61.2% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 45.4% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 45.8% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 60% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 46.9% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 75% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 45% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 40% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 46.9% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 70% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 70% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.2% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 52.2% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 37.5% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 60% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.0% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 68.2% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 52.2% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 37.5% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 16.7% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.9% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 75% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 72% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 42.8% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 70.0% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 56% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 68.2% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 56.7% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 76% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 46.7% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.6% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 72% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 68.5% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.6% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 76% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.0% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 53.8% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.8% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.8% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 37.6% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 57.6% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 88% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.1% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 23.1% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 22.2% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 17.3% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 65.4% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.0% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 71.5% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 42.9% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 46.2% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 42.9% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $2,300,000 | $9,350 | $2,448,000 | $10,116 | $2,388,000 | $10,338 | |||
Federal: | $208,000 | $846 | 9.0% | $337,000 | $1,393 | 13.8% | $585,000 | $2,532 | 24.5% |
State: | $1,553,000 | $6,313 | 67.5% | $1,622,000 | $6,702 | 66.3% | $1,375,000 | $5,952 | 57.6% |
Local: | $539,000 | $2,191 | 23.4% | $489,000 | $2,021 | 20.0% | $428,000 | $1,853 | 17.9% |
Total Expenditures: | $2,111,000 | $8,581 | $2,101,000 | $8,682 | $2,248,000 | $9,732 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $1,821,000 | $7,402 | $1,847,000 | $7,632 | $2,009,000 | $8,697 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,060,000 | $4,309 | 58.2% | $1,016,000 | $4,198 | 55.0% | $1,233,000 | $5,338 | 61.4% |
Student and Staff Support: | $98,000 | $398 | 5.4% | $123,000 | $508 | 6.7% | $120,000 | $519 | 6.0% |
Administration: | $268,000 | $1,089 | 14.7% | $308,000 | $1,273 | 16.7% | $282,000 | $1,221 | 14.0% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $395,000 | $1,606 | 21.7% | $400,000 | $1,653 | 21.7% | $374,000 | $1,619 | 18.6% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $37,000 | $150 | $6,000 | $25 | $10,000 | $43 | |||
Construction: | $26,000 | $106 | $1,000 | $4 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $3,000 | $12 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $5,000 | $20 | $2,000 | $8 | $9,000 | $39 | |||
Total Salary: | $974,000 | $3,959 | $986,000 | $4,074 | $1,120,000 | $4,848 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $692,000 | $2,813 | 71.0% | $673,000 | $2,781 | 68.3% | $787,000 | $3,407 | 70.3% |
Other Salary: | $282,000 | $1,146 | 29.0% | $313,000 | $1,293 | 31.7% | $333,000 | $1,442 | 29.7% |
Total Benefit: | $413,000 | $1,679 | $399,000 | $1,649 | $469,000 | $2,030 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $280,000 | $1,138 | 67.8% | $263,000 | $1,087 | 65.9% | $332,000 | $1,437 | 70.8% |
Other Benefit: | $133,000 | $541 | 32.2% | $136,000 | $562 | 34.1% | $137,000 | $593 | 29.2% |
* Pleasant Hill School District 69 was rated 1.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.